Pathway Doxorubicin Pathway (Cancer Cell), Pharmacodynamics

Representation of the candidate genes involved in the action of doxorubicin in a stylized cancer cell.
Doxorubicin Pathway (Cancer Cell), Pharmacodynamics
dox abcc1 dox dox abcc2 abcg2 ralbp1 abcb1 slc22a16 sod1 cat gpx1 nqo1 nos3 xdh nfkb1 dox top2a mlh1 msh2 ercc2 tp53
clickable pathway icons


The anthracycline doxorubicin (DOX), a metabolite of Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius [Article:5365804], is a chemotherapeutic agent developed in the 1970s [Article:17652804] that is used in the treatment of a wide range of cancers, including non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma, multiple myeloma, lung, ovarian, gastric, thyroid, breast, sarcoma, and pediatric cancers [Articles:17652804, 1462166]. This pathway shows the pharmacodynamics of doxorubicin in a stylized cancer cell and depicts candidate pharmacogenes.

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain DOX antitumor activity [Article:10075079]. Here we describe 2 major mechanisms: the intercalation into DNA, leading to inhibition of the DNA synthesis or poisoning of topoisomerase II (TOP2A); and generation of free radicals, leading to DNA and cell membrane damage. We also show some pharmacokinetics (for more details see Doxorubicin PK Pathway) and depict transporters associated with drug resistance in cancer cell lines.

Intercalation into DNA
Anthracyclines are known to intercalate into DNA in vitro, and several crystal structures of complexes of DNA with DOX exist (see for example pdb entries 151D [Article:8142363] and 1P20 [Article:12717724]). In early in vitro studies, DOX was shown to cause DNA breaks [Article:566561] and to interfere with DNA synthesis [Articles:1277199, 1089410]. Other work has shown that the DNA-DOX interaction is related to the poisoning of topoisomerase II (TOP2A) [Articles:2551497, 6093249], but not toposiomerase I [Articles:2164630, 10385686]. Translocation of DOX into the nucleus is thought to occur via binding to proteasomes [Article:11289116]. Subsequent TOP2A poison-mediated cytotoxicity is postulated to involve the mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MLH1 [Article:11477562] because loss of DNA mismatch repair function results in resistance to doxorubicin [Articles:11477562, 9514047].

Topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage is followed by cell death [Article:11172690]. TP53, a gene that is a major player of the DNA-damage response and apoptosis [Article:11790556], has been implicated in this DOX-apoptosis pathway. Several studies have shown an upregulation of TP53 occurs with anthracycline treatment [Articles:12739000, 10914720], and ERCC2 and TP53 have been shown to functionally interact in a p53-mediated apoptotic pathway with DOX treatment in lymphoblastoid cell lines [Article:10467415]. However, the actual involvement of p53 in DOX-induced apopotosis has been debated by other researchers [Article:11172690].

Generation of free radicals
DOX can undergo a one-electron reduction by several oxidoreductases to form a DOX-semiquinone radical [Article:2555273]. These enzymes include mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenases present in the sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria: NDUFS2,3,7 EC [Articles:12688675, 2850270, 9618942] as well as cytosolic enzymes NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (NQO1) [Article:12688675], xanthine oxidase (XDH EC [Articles:12688675, 1911046] and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3) [Article:9333325]. Re-oxidation of the DOX-semiquinone radical back to DOX by leads to the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and hydrogen peroxide [Article:9576481]. ROS, causing oxidative stress, can be deactivated by glutathione peroxidase, catalase and superoxide dismutase [Article:12751786].

Some researchers have related DOX free radical formation to cytotoxicity; these studies relate DOX cellular resistance to enzymes deactivating ROS. DOX has been shown to promote apoptosis in DOX-treated endothelial cells and myocytes through the formation of ROS and hydrogen peroxide [Article:12139490] via the activation of NF-kB (NFKB1, p50). But, activation of NF-kB blocked apoptotic cell death DOX-treated cancer cells [Article:12139490], indicating a possible different mechanism for cytotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. These researchers, and others, argue that the role of free radical formation is primarily related to cardiotoxicity and not cytotoxicity [Article:10075079], in part, because the use of an iron chelator, dexrazoxane, that binds the iron involved in the free radical formations, demonstrates cardioprotective properties without impacting clinical outcome [Articles:15038979, 9777314, 9193324, 9193323, 18425895].

While DOX is a valuable clinical antineoplastic agent, in addition to problems with cardiotoxicity, resistance is also a problem limiting its utility [Articles:2982511, 1462166]. The mechanism of resistance is thought to involve, in particular, ABCB1 (MDR1, Pgp) and ABCC1 (MRP1) as well as other transporters.

In general, ABCB1 confers resistance by acting as an ATP-dependent drug efflux pump causing increased drug efflux [Article:8763334] via altered or increased expression [Articles:8763334, 9073310]. Cytotoxicity of DOX increases with inhibition of ABCB1 [Articles:1352877, 15788683]. Human ABCC1, originally cloned from a DOX-selected cancer cell line [Article:1360704] confers resistance to anthracyclines. Various studies on DOX-resistant cell lines have shown that resistance can be overcome via an inhibition of ABCB1, ABCC1 and ABCC2. [Articles:12370750, 15164094, 7214365, 1352877, 3180056, 17704753, 11172691, 7954421].

Studies have also shown an association between resistance and activity of other transporters. For example, RALBP1 activity was shown to be 2 times higher in a DOX-sensitive cell line versus DOX resistant cell line [Article:12527936]. In a study of a panel of lung cancer cell lines, a correlation between the DOX semiquinone levels and proteins levels for ABCC3 and ABCG2 was demonstrated [Article:11410522]. Glutathione transferase activity was found to be greater in DOX-sensitive leukemia cells than in DOX-resistant leukemia cells [Article:2897875].

Most of the in vivo PGx studies of DOX have focused on cardiotoxicity rather than efficacy (see Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity PD Pathway for details of PGx studies of toxicity). Polymorphisms in CYBA (rs4673), GST1A (rs3957357) and NOS3 (rs1799983 and rs2070744) have been associated with cancer outcomes in response to DOX. CYBA (rs4673), GST1A (rs rs3957357) were associated with event free survival and outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP, a regimen that includes DOX [Article:19448608]. Variants in NOS3 (rs1799983 and rs2070744) were associated with increased risk of cancer recurrence after chemotherapy that included DOX [Article:19671875].

For more details of DOX Pgx see Genetics Tab.

Authors: Caroline F. Thorn, Connie Oshiro, Sharon Marsh, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Xing Jian Lou, Howard McLeod.
Thorn Caroline F, Oshiro Connie, Marsh Sharon, Hernandez-Boussard Tina, McLeod Howard, Klein Teri E, Altman Russ B. "Doxorubicin pathways: pharmacodynamics and adverse effects" Pharmacogenetics and genomics (2010).
If you would like to reproduce this PharmGKB pathway diagram, send an email to to request permission. In your request, include the name of the pathway diagram you would like to use and provide a description of the purpose.
Therapeutic Categories:
  • Anticancer agents

Entities in the Pathway

Genes (18)

Relationships in the Pathway

Arrow FromArrow ToControllersPMID
doxorubicin dox-semiquinone CAT, GPX1, NOS3, NQO1, SOD1, XDH 12688675, 12751786, 1911046, 9333325
TOP2A TOP2A doxorubicin 2551497, 6093249
dox-semiquinone doxorubicin 19442138, 3005279
dox-semiquinone reactive oxygen species
doxorubicin doxorubicin SLC22A16 17559346
doxorubicin doxorubicin 11289116
doxorubicin doxorubicin ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2, ABCG2, RALBP1 11172691, 12370750, 12527936, 1352877, 15164094, 17704753, 3180056, 7214365, 7954421

Download data in TSV format. Other formats are available on the Downloads/LinkOuts tab.